advertisement
In the infamous Dadri mob-lynching case, the Uttar Pradesh Police filed the first chargesheet on Wednesday against 15 people, including a minor. But strangely, the temple priest, who was earlier touted to be a ‘major link’ in the incident by the UP Police, has not been named as a witness in the chargesheet.
The priest’s announcement that Akhlaq’s family had allegedly consumed beef had reportedly triggered the attack by the mob. He is also one of the key persons who could have divulged the names of the conspirators and given the police a sense of the sequence of events. The priest has been missing from the village ever since the incident.
By the UP Police’s own admission, the two main accused, Vishal Rana and Shivam, who spread the rumour in the first place, had forced the priest to make the announcement. The question thus arises why the police, despite this knowledge, did not consider the priest’s testimony important. Could his statement not be an important corroborative evidence to indict the culprits?
The police also claim that the reason why such a rumour was spread is not critical to the investigation.
Danish, who is the key eyewitness in the case, had given his statement to the UP police but that is not admissible in court. According to the Superintendent of Police of Gautam Budhnagar, Sanjay Singh, it is essential that Danish’s statement be recorded under oath. His sister’s statement was, however, recorded before a Magistrate.
So far the UP Police have arrested 17 accused in the case, including a juvenile and a home guard; 15 accused have been chargesheeted. The final report on whether the meat found at Akhlaq’s home was indeed beef is still pending.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)