The Cow Protection Movement is Hurting Farmers, Herders: Report

Since 2014, when BJP took over at the Centre, the growth of beef and leather exports has nearly come to a halt.

(Photo: Reuters)

India’s cow protection movement is hurting farmers and herders across religious and social lines, according to a new report by the international non-governmental organisation Human Rights Watch, released on Tuesday, 19 February.

Since 2014, when BJP took over at the Centre, the growth of beef and leather exports, in which India plays a key role in the international market, has nearly come to a halt.

This has affected India’s foreign currency reserves, the report states from an analysis of data from the commerce and industry ministry from 2010-11 to 2017-2018.

Between 2010 and 2018, India reported 123 attacks of cow-related hate violence – 98 percent of these after PM Narendra Modi’s BJP government assumed power at the Centre, according to the FactChecker database that tracks such crimes.

The Human Rights Watch report relies on this database, along with some others.

Vigilantism Affecting Livelihoods, Forex Reserves

Many Hindus consider the cow sacred, and 99.38 percent Indians now live under cow-protection laws, as IndiaSpend reported on 14 April 2017. In February 2019, the central government announced a national commission for cow protection.

“These policies and the vigilante attacks have disrupted India’s cattle trade and the rural agricultural economy, as well as leather and meat export industries that are linked to farming and dairy sectors,” the Human Rights Watch says.

India is the largest exporter of beef in the world, exporting buffalo meat worth $4 billion a year. However, since 2014, exports have mostly declined.

Policies of the Yogi Adityanath-led BJP state government in Uttar Pradesh, India’s top meat-producing state, have led to further uncertainties over the future of the trade, the report observes.

In 2014-15, India registered $4.78 billion worth of buffalo beef exports – the highest since 2010 – although growth declined by 26.05 percentage points, from 35.93 percent in 2013-14 to 9.88 percent in 2014-15.

Thereafter, the quantum of exports has hovered around $4 billion, declining 3.93 percent in 2016-17 and growing by a smaller 3.06 percent in 2017-18.

Fear of cow vigilantes and shutdown of hundreds of slaughter houses has led to disruption in the availability of cattle hides, the report says.

While export of leather and leather products grew by more than 18 percent in 2013-14 and nine percent in 2014-15, growth declined by nearly 20 percentage points to -9.86 percent in 2015-16.

It grew again but at a much smaller rate of 1.4 percent in 2017-18, the report says from its analysis of government data.

“Hindutva leaders who are promoting this obsession with cows don’t realise how much loss they are causing to their own Hindu community, and damage they are causing to their country,” said ML Parihar, a Rajasthan-based author and expert on animal husbandry, who is quoted in the report.

Minorities Targeted, But Economic Fallout Hurts Hindus Too

In recent years, several BJP-ruled states have adopted stricter laws and policies that disproportionately harm minority communities, the report observes.

The attacks, often by groups claiming links to militant outfits linked to the BJP, largely target Muslim, Dalit or Adivasi (indigenous) communities.

Dalits, customarily responsible for disposal of cattle carcasses and skin for leather goods, and Muslims, the traditional managers of slaughterhouses and meat shops, are disproportionately affected by attacks carried out in the name of cow protection, the report notes.

Among victims of such violence, the Muslims and Dalits account for 56 percent and 10 percent of those attacked, while Hindus comprise nine percent of victims, according to the FactChecker database.

Muslims, particularly, account for 78 percent of those killed in such attacks, FactChecker shows.

The inadequate response from authorities to these attacks is hurting communities, including Hindus, whose livelihoods are linked to livestock, the report says. This includes farmers, herders, cattle transporters, meat traders and leather workers.

Nearly 55 percent of India’s population is engaged in agriculture and associated activities, contributing 17 percent of the country’s gross value added.

India, the world’s largest milk producer, is home to about 190 million cattle and 108 million buffaloes. Farmers maintain and trade this livestock to supplement their incomes and food requirements.

But growing violence over cow protection appears to have contributed to a significant decrease in the number of animals traded at government-organised cattle fairs, the report says.

For example, the Rajasthan state government organises 10 cattle fairs annually. In 2010-11, more than 56,000 cows and bulls were brought to these fairs and more than 31,000 were sold. In 2016-17, 11,000 cattle were brought and less than 3,000 sold, the report says.

With the growing mechanisation of agriculture and the ageing of cattle, farmers are forced to abandon cows because they cannot afford the costs of maintaining them, the report says.

This had led to a rise in the numbers of stray cattle, endangering farmers’ crops.

Counter-measures by state governments to curb damage are in turn compromising efforts aimed at improving health and education outcomes, the report observes.

India is party to core international human rights law treaties that prohibit discrimination based on race, ethnicity or religion, and require governments to provide all citizens with equal protection under law, the report points out.

“The government is obligated to protect religious and other minority populations and to fully and fairly prosecute those responsible for discrimination and violence against them,” the report says.

“The authorities also should reverse policies that harm livestock-linked livelihoods, particularly in rural communities, and hold to account police and other institutions that fail to uphold rights because of caste or religious prejudice,” it adds.

(The author is an assistant editor with IndiaSpend)

(Published in an arrangement with IndiaSpend)