advertisement
A special court on Tuesday, 23 August, issued a bailable warrant against Rubaiya Sayeed, the daughter of former Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Mufti Mohammad Sayeed, after she did not appear for cross-examination in a case related to her abduction by the JKLF in 1989.
Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF) chief Yasin Malik, one of the accused in the case, appeared before the court from Delhi's Tihar Jail via video conference.
He once again insisted on his physical appearance while turning down the court's offer of legal aid or amicus, standing counsel for the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Monika Kohli said. On 15 July, Rubaiya had identified Malik and three others as the ones who took her captive.
Rubaiya was abducted near Lal Ded Hospital on 8 December 1989 when her father was the Union home minister and freed from captivity five days later on 13 December after the then V P Singh government, supported by the BJP at the Centre, released five terrorists in exchange.
Rubaiya, who stays in Tamil Nadu, is listed as a prosecution witness by the CBI, which took over investigation into the case in early 1990."Rubaiya had to appear before the court for cross-examination (on Tuesday) but she remained absent.
Malik, 56, is at present lodged in the high-security Tihar Jail after he was sentenced by a special NIA court in Delhi in May. He was arrested in early 2019 in connection with the 2017 terror-funding case registered by the National Investigation Agency (NIA). On the last hearing of the case, Rubaiya appeared in the court for the first time and identified Malik, who was present through video conference.
"This is the person and his name is Yasin Malik. He was the man who threatened me that he will drag me out of the minibus if I refused to follow their diktat," Rubaiya had told the judge.
She later identified him again through the pictures that were exhibited in the court. The CBI had framed charges against 10 people, including Malik, in the case in January last year. Malik observed a 10-day hunger strike from 22 July after the Centre did not respond to his plea for allowing him to physically appear in the Jammu court hearing the abduction case.
Turning down his plea for physical appearance, the court said there were clear directions from the high court for producing the accused in all cases via video conference. In March 2020, the special court had framed charges against the JKLF chief and six others in the case related to the killing of IAF personnel on the outskirts of Srinagar in January 1990.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)