advertisement
Four people were killed and several others lost their limbs in Chennai on Tuesday, 24 July, after people who were hanging out of a crowded suburban train hit a cement and grill fence. The train reached a different platform without intimating the passengers – and those who were hanging on to the footboard did not know they would hit a barrier.
Eighteen-year-old Murthy was one of the passengers who had crammed himself into the little space available near the footboard. The train was unusually crowded that day due to a 40-minute delay in the train services in the Beach station-Chengalpet route. While four of his fellow commuters lost their lives in the fall, Murthy’s legs, which came under the train’s wheels, had to be amputated.
And when the media questioned South Railway Inspector General Birendra Kumar about the incident, he said, “It was just an unfortunate incident.”
In the aftermath of the tragedy, several questions are being raised about the lack of safety features on local trains – including doors. Questions are also being raised about the number and frequency of trains, and about how serious (or not) the authorities are when it comes to giving correct information to passengers.
Every day, around 11 lakh commuters use the city’s suburban railway service, which is divided into four lines – west line, south line, north line and the Mass Rapid Transit System (MRTS) line.
However, in the last 10 days, nine people have lost their lives in the south line, where the accident occurred on Tuesday morning.
The Passengers Amenities Association, a statutory organisation under the Indian Ministry of Railways, assigned to analyse the grievances of passengers, notes that the problem is three-fold:
Train number 40701, which passengers boarded on Tuesday, and other trains on the South Line were delayed by 40 minutes due to a technical error in the signalling system.
Commuters, however, received no intimation regarding this and were expecting the usual number of six to eight trains between 7.30 am and 8.30 am in the morning. When the train arrived, passengers made a rush for the train, as they were already late for work and college.
While tabling their concern over the low frequency of trains, the Passengers Amenities Association points to the inaction of railway authorities.
Railway authorities, on the other hand, claim that increasing the number of trains is not an overnight task.
Currently, 227 trains run on the route, with fast trains arriving every 20 minutes. Passengers, however, have been demanding its frequency be increased to one every 10 minutes.
When TNM asked a railway authority about the increasing number of fatalities, he resorted to whataboutery, and stated that deaths related to rail accidents are far lesser than road transport.
“The fares are low and so increasing the number of trains cannot be implemented immediately,” he said, adding, “We are doing our best to ensure the safety of passengers.”
The Association also says that installing floor-to-ceiling doors is the basic safety measure that can be put in place.
“If the doors are closed before the train departs, it will ensure that the passengers are safe inside. When a metro can have such facilities, why not suburban trains?” points out the Association.
(Published in an arrangement with The News Minute.)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)