advertisement
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) claims to have cracked the murder mystery of 7-year-old Pradyumn Thakur of Ryan International School. The agency apprehended a Class XI minor student of the same school on Tuesday night at 11:30 pm under sections of murder of the Juvenile Justice Act.
On Wednesday, the CBI produced the juvenile before the Juvenile Justice Board in Gurugram and secured three-day CBI remand.
The latest developments in the probe gave a new twist to the case and also raised questions around Gurugram Police’s initial investigation.
Evading the questions posed by The Quint, Gurugram’s Commissioner of Police, Sandeep Khirwar said:
The Gurugram Police had arrested the bus conductor, Ashok Kumar, of the Ryan International School, and claimed that he tried to sexually assault the 7-year-old before killing him.
According to the CBI, so far they have not found any evidence of the conductor’s involvement in the case.
According to the CBI, they have sufficient and strong evidence against the juvenile prime accused.
CCTV footage is the main evidence that helped the CBI identify the 16-year-old suspect, said the agency. Apart from the footage, the CBI questioned several students of the school, which helped the agency in zero in on the prime accused. Other substantive scientific evidence claimed by the CBI are forensics analysis and mobile phone records.
But now the question remains, if the CCTV footage was such an important piece of evidence, and it had been in Gurugram Police’s custody from Day 1 of the investigation, why couldn’t the Gurugram Police have cracked the case? Why wasn’t the 16-year-old questioned if he was visible in the footage, and why was the blame pinned on the bus conductor instead?
However, the CBI said that the conductor, who was the earlier suspect in the case, has not been cleared just yet, and his role in the case is yet to be ascertained.
The CBI says it has found that Pradyumn was not the intended target.
Since the Juvenile suspect was academically weak, he wanted to postpone the exams and the Parent-Teachers Meeting, which were scheduled to be held around the days when Pradyumn was murdered, said the CBI.
As of now, the agency is not ruling out the involvement of more suspects in the case. Apparently, the CCTV footage shows more than one senior student coming out of the toilet, though the CBI is very tight-lipped about the possible involvement of the other suspects.
The murder weapon used – an eight-inch knife – was recovered from the commode after the incident, and is currently in CBI’s possession. Was the murder planned?
As The Quint reported earlier, the doctor who conducted the autopsy of Pradyumn’s body had said that Pradyumn was held from behind before his throat was slit twice with a knife.
As of now, the CBI has not yet confirmed whether the juvenile’s fingerprints match the fingerprints present on the murder weapon.
Speaking to ANI, the arrested student’s father claims his son is not guilty and had only reported the crime to the gardener and the teachers.
Pradyumn’s parents were called to the CBI HQ on Wednesday morning where they were briefed about the latest developments in the case.
The family is not ruling out the school management’s involvement in hushing up the juvenile’s involvement in the murder along with Gurugram Police.
Barun Thakur’s lawyer, Sushil Tekriwal, had this to say:
The new Juvenile Justice Act, enacted in 2015, lowered the age at which minors could be prosecuted as adults from 18 to 16.
Under the new Juvenile Justice Act, the Juvenile Justice Boards have the power to decide - based on a preliminary assessment report - whether the accused should be tried in an adult court or not.
If he is tried as a juvenile, his sentence for the crime would be a maximum of three years in a juvenile reform facility. If he is tried as an adult, however, his sentence could range from 14 years to life imprisonment in a regular jail with hardened criminals, to even hanging.
Meanwhile, family of the implicated bus conductor, Ashok Kumar, earlier accused in the case, said that they were relieved to know the latest developments, even though Kumar hasn’t been given a clean chit.
Kumar’s family alleged that he was forced to confess to the crime by the Gurugram Police and was even beaten up and heavily sedated while in custody. The family also demanded action against Gurugram Police.
The arrest of the Class XI student in the Ryan murder case reveals the differing accounts laid down by the CBI and the police in their respective investigations.
The CBI’s investigation is still on but it certainly raises several questions about the investigation carried out by our State Police.
Haryana DGP BS Sandhu said there was no pressure on the police team probing the matter before it was handed over to the CBI.
Sandhu denied that there was any pressure on the police to solve the case or that they proceeded in haste. "The government had recommended handing over the inquiry to the CBI," DGP Sandhu told reporters in Panchkula.
Haryana Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar also defended the state police claiming that its investigations were not complete when the probe was handed over to the CBI.
When a reporter questioned that the Haryana Police had after the arrest of school bus conductor Ashok Kumar claimed to have solved the case, the DGP said:
(Breathe In, Breathe Out: Are you finding it tough to breathe polluted air? Join hands with FIT to find #PollutionKaSolution. Send in your suggestions to fit@thequint.com or WhatsApp @ +919999008335)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)