Cauvery Issue: Local Media Fanned The Flames, Encouraged Violence
“There’s no other option but to protest with violence and arson,” a Kannada news anchor said.
advertisement
“Amma, we (in Karnataka) too have Tamils, and Tamil Nadu-registered vehicles. Be warned.” The man who said this was not one of the few thousand men who went about indulging in vandalism and arson in several parts of Bengaluru on Monday. These words were uttered, with full theatrical effect, by the news anchor of a Kannada news channel.
On Monday, the law and order situation in Bengaluru deteriorated in the hours after the Supreme Court modified its order, directing Karnataka to release 12,000 cusecs to Tamil Nadu till September 20. Throughout the day, Kannada news channels vied to outdo each other and be provocative.
No Option but to Protest With Arson: Media Baits the Public
Sample this for instance. Sometime after 9.30 pm on Monday, the editor of one the oldest Kannada news channels said on air: “We voluntarily reported that prohibitory orders have been invoked with the intention of preventing riots in Bengaluru. But the police went and clarified that they had not invoked prohibitory orders. What does one make of their sensibilities?”
(Reports that Section 144 had been imposed began making the rounds around 1pm. But as the rumour began to spread, the police were forced to clarify that no prohibitory orders had been imposed. It was only at 5pm that the city police invoked Section 144 across the city.)
Not a Word of Condemnation for the Violence
According to Scroll, Tamil news channels behaved in a similar manner. On Sunday, Tamil channels ran on loop, a video clip of a Tamil youth being assaulted allegedly for mocking Kannada actors on the Cauvery issue. On Monday morning, a petrol bomb had been thrown at the New Woodlands hotel in Chennai. Three hours after the attack was first reported, four petrol bombs were hurled at the hotel, Scroll reported.
In Karnataka, several Kannada channels had their own trajectory of provocative reporting. One journalist who requested anonymity described it thus: “It’s like they went with kerosene in one hand, and a ready disclaimer in the other, asking people not to spread panic and rumours.”
The language used by the channels while reporting on the protests and vandalism was troubling. Most channels persisted with using terms such as “pro-Kannada” to describe the groups protesting over the issue. On Monday, the tickers and taglines run by the news channels suggested that the whole city was burning even though violence was localized to some pockets.
“Kaveri krodhagni kshandinda kshanakke teevra swaroopa padkolltha ide” / The fiery anger over the Cauvery is rising in intensity from one moment to the next
“Kaveri kichu” / The fire of Cauvery
“janara horatakke police nirbandha” / Police restrain the people’s struggle (with regard to Section 144)
Although it was clear within a few hours that the protests had descended into vandalism, there wasn’t a word of condemnation from most news channels in their coverage although they ran separate notices periodically, urging people to maintain calm.
Kannada Media’s Worst Crisis of Credibility
For instance, despite vandals setting fire to around 40 buses at the KPN Travels depot in Nayandahalli on Monday evening, news channels still called them “horatagararu”, a word which means a noble person who fights for a cause and whose meaning is simply not captured in the English equivalent “activist”. For vandalism, journalists usually use the term “kidigedigalu” or “dushkarmigalu” meaning “miscreants” or “vandals”.
Through Monday, as social media provided a counter to the news monopoly of the mainstream media, many people were scathing about the alarmist nature of the media.
By evening as things quietened in Bengaluru, the manner in which Kannada television channels covered developments in the city became a subject of discussion among journalists. Some joked while others expressed deep dismay.
A senior journalist with a Kannada daily told The News Minute that this was probably the worst crisis of credibility that the Kannada media had faced. He said that their coverage was obviously driven by the expectation of higher ratings, but the scope for self-criticism is very limited.
“We are bound by Kannada and so our world is very limited. We have nowhere else to go, but it’s not the same with English journalists. We cannot be critical of our fellow journalists the way English media can. It is essential this behaviour is criticised,” he told The News Minute.
Such Reportage Cannot be Explained Away as Greed for TRPs
Senior journalist DV Rajashekar, who has been in the profession for 36 years, told The News Minute that perhaps things wouldn’t have got so out of hand had news channels exercised some restraint.
Rajashekar said that the tone of such reportage could not be explained away only by the greed for TRPs. The ratings for channels are likely to be higher, but not significantly.
In his view, introspection is required as the problem is much larger.
On Tuesday however, channels were somewhat subdued, perhaps taking a cue from the criticism and from newspapers that were more objective in their coverage. Newspapers, thankfully, had showed some restraint.
Note: The views expressed here are the personal opinions of the author.
(Published in an arrangement with The News Minute.)
Also Read:
Strong Solutions, Proactive Methods Alone Can Solve Cauvery Crisis
Varying Rains: There’s No Option Other Than Sharing Cauvery Water
Will Burning 45 of My Buses Solve Cauvery Issue, Asks KPN Owner
The Cauvery Dispute: An Excuse for Thugs to Come Out and Play
QRant: Cauvery Violence Will Haunt Bengaluru For Years
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)