advertisement
The Bombay High Court refused to grant relief to controversial Islamic preacher Zakir Naik, who is facing charges of inciting communal disharmony and committing unlawful activities, observing that he did not show any interest or desire to help the probe agencies, on Wednesday, 20 June.
A division bench of Justices RM Savant and Revati Mohite Dere was hearing a petition filed by Naik seeking a direction to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to submit reports on the probe carried out by them against Naik.
In the petition, Naik also sought direction to the Ministry of External Affairs to cancel the revocation of his passport.
The court said it cannot pass any order pertaining to revocation of passport and asked Naik to file a separate petition for the same.
The offences registered against Naik are under Section 153 (a) of IPC for promoting enmity among different religions and under Sections 10, 13 and 18 of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) for being a member of an unlawful association, abetting an unlawful activity and criminal conspiracy.
"These are serious offences in which a person faces maximum punishment up to life imprisonment. The petitioner has been declared a proclaimed offender and extradition proceedings have been initiated with the authorities in Malaysia. Under such circumstances, this court cannot grant any relief to the petitioner," Justice Savant said.
The court added that Naik should have ideally come back to India and presented himself before the investigating agencies.
"Such long distance thing will not work. In the absentia of the petitioner, how can we entertain such pleas," it said.
Naik's NGO – Islamic Research Foundation (IRF) – has also been declared unlawful since 2016 and is being probed by the ED over allegations of money laundering to the tune of more than Rs 18 crore.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)