View From Bhutan: Indian and Chinese Media Need to Calm Down

Bhutan is the third leg holding up the Doklam stool – allowing both India and China the room to manoeuvre.

There has been a curious trend among certain sections of the Chinese and Indian media, in their coverage towards Bhutan.

(Photo: The Quint)

There has been a curious trend among certain sections of the Chinese and Indian media, in their coverage towards Bhutan, since the Doklam crisis started from 16 June.

The Chinese state media went first bashing Bhutan over GNH, its happiness brand and ultimately bringing up the issue of the people in the camps.

The icing on the cake was a Chinese writer doing an in-depth analysis of Bhutan, based on his visit to Nepal.

Also Read: View from Bhutan: China Has Always Had Its Eye on Doklam

Of late, there seems to be a number of articles in the Indian media starting to cast doubts over Bhutan and its disciplined silence.

One theory that started doing the rounds was on the visit of the Chinese Ambassador’s wife to Bhutan. Never mind that it happened a full 35 days before the 16 June standoff started. It was by all accounts a private visit wrapped up in two days – with no meetings with any government officials.

Not satisfied, sections of the Indian media and even academia, started floating interesting and fantastical theories, based either on notions or piecemeal information, on Bhutan’s supposed ties and inclinations.

Also Read: Should India Take China’s Doklam Threat Seriously? Experts Speak

Bhutan’s ‘Silence’

The latest round seems to be questions over Bhutan’s silence, which is being either questioned or misinterpreted by sections of the Indian and Chinese media.

Bhutan has made its position clear in the demarche and the Foreign Ministry statement, and there is nothing more to be said for now – unless there are additional standoffs or the situation on the ground changes.

Both Chinese and Indian media outlets should realise that while Bhutan, as a small country stuck between two giants, is behaving in the current way to avoid unnecessarily antagonising either side, it is also in the interest of both India and China.

The First World War of 1914-1918 was triggered in part by an alliance system that involved small states and any quarrel between small and big states held the potential for a bigger conflict. The First World War, in fact, started with an ultimatum from Austria-Hungary to tiny Serbia after the assassination of Arch Duke Franz Ferdinand that eventually dragged in all the major world powers of the time.

Bhutan and its leaders can choose a very different and jingoistic tact from the current low-key approach. It can also whip up and play to nationalist and hyper-nationalist audiences and sentiments at home, as general elections are due in a year.

However, that would neither be good for India or China. In fact, Bhutan’s low-key approach while stating its position – gives ample space for ‘face-saving’ measures by both India and China, and does not embarrass either side or paint them into a diplomatic corner.

Bhutan – The Third Leg Holding up the Doklam Stool

To put it plainly, Bhutan does not want India and China to go to war, and it is avoiding doing anything that can heat up an already heated situation.

Coming back to World War I, long before the assassination or ultimatum to Serbia, the opposing Triple Entente and the Central Powers already had their differences and interests focused primarily on their need to balance each other’s powers coupled with competing economic interests and an arms race.

So the assassination and ultimatum to Serbia was only a pretext of long existing tensions.

In the case of India and China, there are larger issues and areas on which the two countries do not agree, apart from Doklam, along with historical differences.

Also Read: Army Moves Troops of Sukna-Based 33 Corps to India-China Border

There is no point pretending that it is Bhutan’s fault somehow or that Bhutan can do something to make it all go away.

Bhutan is providing the third leg holding up the Doklam stool – allowing both India and China the room to manoeuvre.

Remove the third leg and you have the real prospect of the whole stool coming crashing down – to the detriment of both India and China.

(This article was first published on The Bhutanese, a private newspaper in Thimphu, Bhutan. Tenzing Lamsang is the Editor of The Bhutanese. He tweets @TenzingLamsang and the newspaper tweets at @thebhutanese. This is an opinion piece and the views expressed above are the author’s own. The Quint neither endorses nor is responsible for the same.)

(We all love to express ourselves, but how often do we do it in our mother tongue? Here's your chance! This Independence Day, khul ke bol with BOL – Love your Bhasha. Sing, write, perform, spew poetry – whatever you like – in your mother tongue. Send us your BOL at [e-mail] or WhatsApp it to 9910181818.)