advertisement
The outrage following 13-year-old Jain girl Aradhana Samdariya’s death has sparked a national debate. On one end, child rights activists deem her death as child abuse and entirely avoidable. The 20,000-odd Jains of Hyderabad, who have come out in support of the Samdariya family, argue otherwise.
Aradhana had completed a 68-day long fast or tivihar upvas. She had consumed only water between sunrise and sunset. Two days after she broke her fast with moong daal ka paani, or plain lentil soup, she felt uneasy and broke into cold sweats. Her parents rushed her to the hospital, but doctors could do nothing to help her. She was brought dead.
For Aradhana’s family and the Jain community supporting them, her death was not to be mourned, but celebrated. She had attained great heights in her tapasya. The outrage within the Jain community is over fact is that their faith is under attack.
The Jain community argues that fasting is an age-old tradition among the believers of their faith. The community has submitted a thick bundle of papers to the police that lists cases of minors and adults who have fasted.
The Jain community’s counter-argument largely is that other religions are allowed to practice rituals that are considered “detrimental”.
In the same line of argument, another member of the community argued that young children have injured themselves while making the janmasthami pyramid and died. Their parents, however, have not been booked.
The community maintains that the family cannot be held culpable as the girl went on fast voluntarily.
Her family, friends and those close to her allege that she was always inclined towards religion.
She had reportedly started fasting for one or two days at the age of five. At the age of eight, she fasted for eight days during paryushan. When Aradhana was 12, the family’s guru completed 34 years of diksha and she went on fast for 34 days.
Her family maintains that she knew fully well the dangers involved and wanted to fast of her own volition. For the first 41 days of her fast, she even attended school, carried her bag and was physically active.
Aradhana died a day after breaking her fast. Her body was cremated within hours. Six days after her death, the incident was brought to light by activist Achyuta Rao who got an anonymous phone call.
It’s hard therefore, to legally pin her death on her parents or her community in the absence of a body for post-mortem.
But if the cause of her death was found to be her 68-day long fast, will a court of law intrude into this “sacred space”?
While the community insists that her death had nothing to do with her fast as it had occurred after she had already broken her fast, here’s what could have happened.
Doctors say Aradhana could have developed a complete electrolyte imbalance resulting in a renal failure. While fasting, the body tries to get sugar and carbohydrates from an already depleted storage. Eventually, the liver and muscles start to break down from deprivation.
Doctors, however, also point out that just like how “all dengue patients don’t die, all those who fast don’t succumb either. It all depends on the body’s mechanism to fight.”
For now however, the investigation into the death that has sparked a national debate on religious freedom seems to have hit a wall.
Source: Mumbai Mirror
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)