advertisement
Video Producer: Shohini Bose
Video Editor: Vivek Gupta
The disengagement process agreed by India and China in Ladakh has progressed further, with disengagement at Patrolling Point 15 in the area completed by Wednesday, 8 July, Indian Army sources told ANI.
The same sources also 'confirmed' reports from Tuesday that the Chinese troops have moved back by approximately 2 km.
On Tuesday, NDTV cited satellite imagery from Maxar to show that by 6 July, the Chinese had actually withdrawn from the embankment near where the clashes between Indian and Chinese forces had taken place on 15 June.
Indian troops have also moved back from the site of the clash. All tents were uprooted, and troops and materials were taken back in vehicles, The Indian Express reported.
A government official, on Tuesday, has shared more details of this disengagement with The Hindu, saying that while China has moved back 2 km from the clash point, India has moved back 1.5 km and further, and owing to this, India will not be able to patrol up to PP14 for at least 30 days where till now it was present.
The two sides have also agreed to have only 30 soldiers each in makeshift tents at new locations, The Indian Express reported, adding that at the second perimeter, which is another one kilometre away, both sides have agreed 50 soldiers will be in tents.
NDTV has reported citing sources that following troop withdrawal at PP14, China would further move back their troops from other flashpoints such as Hot Springs, or Patrol Point 15 and Gogra (Patrol Point 17A) within next two days.
“It is the first phase of the disengagement process. Further steps will be taken after the next round of military-level talks,” sources told NDTV.
The new developments have taken place after a telephonic dialogue between National Security Advisor of India Ajit Doval and State Councillor and Minister of Foreign Affairs of China HE Wang Yi, after which both sides agreed to disengage and maintain peace.
Speaking about another crucial flashpoint, the Pangong Tso area, called the fingers area, where the Chinese had reportedly first tried to change the status quo in May, MHA sources said, “The Fingers area (in Pangong Tso) is more complicated, so that will take time.”
There has been no disengagement in this area at all. The location of the LAC at this area has been disputed by both sides. The Hindu reported, “At Pangong Tso, some tents have been removed from Finger 4 area and the PLA has moved back some distance, said a second government source without elaborating and added that details of the pullback had to be verified on the ground.”
The Indian Express quoted an army officer as saying, “While there seems to be a Chinese intention to step back a bit, removing a couple of tents or a few vehicles going back means nothing.”
Talks at the diplomatic level have also been going on between the two countries to defuse the tensions, which had emerged first in early May.
A verification of this movement has also been carried out. “The verification has been done. A second team went to the PP 14 area today and reverification was done. All structures, from bunkers to tents, have been removed by both sides. There is not a single soldier from either side in the almost two kilometre vicinity of PP 14. There will be no patrolling by either side until both agree,” an official told the daily.
Three Corps Commander-level meetings have taken place since 6 June.
“Now the next one is likely to be scheduled after 10 or 11 July, depending on the progress we make on what we have agreed about Gogra and Hot Springs region,” MHA sources said according to the report.
On Monday, the Ministry of External Affairs said that special representatives of India and China had a telephonic conversation on recent developments at the India-China border areas on Sunday, 5 July, and the two sides had decided to complete the disengagement process expeditiously.
"The two Special Representatives agreed that both sides should take guidance from the consensus of the leaders that maintenance of peace and tranquility in the India-China border areas was essential for the further development of our bilateral relations and that two sides should not allow differences to become disputes," it added.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)