advertisement
The Supreme Court on Friday said that the provisions of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act can’t be invoked by alleged sex workers to resist their eviction from brothels, that have been directed to be closed by the courts.
The bench comprising Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose and Justice Amitava Roy said that such an interpretation (of Section 18 of the Act) would be “absurd, illogical, unrealistic, impractical and would defeat the purpose of law.”
The court’s observation came after counsel Kamini Jaiswal appeared for two petitioners residing in a brothel in Delhi.
Petitioners approached the court, contesting the Delhi High Court order which upheld an earlier verdict, convicting three alleged sex workers. The court also directed the eviction of those residing in two places used as brothels, and the closure of the latter.
Those in-charge of the two brothels were convicted on charges of trafficking of minor girls under the act.
As the vacation bench rejected all pleas against the eviction of around 38 people from these two places, Jaiswal referred to the judgements by which the apex court had directed the formulation of schemes for the rehabilitation of sex workers.
Jaiswal told the bench that despite the direction of the Supreme Court, the Delhi government had not taken any steps for their rehabilitation and that they are being thrown out.
In a statement, the DCW described the apex court’s rejection of the petitions as a “positive development”.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)