3 Held Guilty in Kopardi Gangrape-Murder That Rocked Maharashtra

A 15-year-old girl was brutally gang-raped and killed in Maharashtra in July 2016.

Candle light march for the Ahmednagar rape survivor by students in Aurangabad.

(Photo: Twitter/ @TuslidasBhoite)

All three accused in the sensational rape and murder of a minor schoolgirl in Kopardi in July 2016, have been found guilty by a special court in Ahmednagar in Maharashtra on Saturday, 18 November.

Vijayalaxmi Khopade, the lawyer for one of the accused, said that the verdict was delivered by Ahmednagar District and Sessions Judge Suvarna Keole under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. Another lawyer, Prakash Aher, told IANS that the quantum of punishment for the convicts will be argued and decided on 21 November by the same court.

On 13 July 2016, a 15-year-old schoolgirl was brutally gang-raped, mutilated and killed, sparking off a major casteist and political furore in Maharashtra. The class 9 student was out to fetch some spices from her grandmother’s home in the same village.

The police nabbed the three prime accused — Jitendra alias Pappu Babulal Shinde (26), Santosh Gorkha Bhawal (30), and Nitin Gopinath Bhailume (28) — who have been found guilty by the court under various charges, including rape, conspiracy, and murder, celebrated Special Public Prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam told the media shortly after the verdict.

A Crime Which Sparked Censure

When the crime came to light late that night, it sparked widespread condemnation and protests across the state, with different political parties and Maratha groups demanding capital punishment for the accused.

The trail for the high-profile case started before the fast-track Special Court on 20 December 2016. In the past 11 months, the prosecution examined 31 witnesses, while defence lawyer Vijayalaxmi Khopade examined one witness in the case.

The prosecution said that the prime accused — Shinde — allegedly raped and murdered the victim, while the other two accused, Bhawal and Bhailume, “conspired” with him in committing the heinous crime.

Though the investigators had previously hyped the crime as “gang-rape,” Nikam later submitted 24 pieces of evidences to deduce that Shinde had raped and smothered the girl to death.

Bhawal and Bhailume were not present physically at the scene of the crime, but helped and conspired with him in committing the gruesome crime.

Meanwhile, several political leaders, social activists, and others all over Maharashtra demanded capital punishment for the three accused, after they were pronounced “guilty” by the Special Court.

How the Trial Proceeded

On the “conspiracy” of the co-accused, Nikam argued that Bhawal and Bhailume were present when Shinde had teased the girl two days prior to the incident. Shinde had given a missed call to Bhailume when he and Bhawal were in the vicinity of the crime.

The entire case was based on ‘circumstantial evidence’ which we have proved to the court. Though the accused may lie, the circumstantial evidences cannot lie. Besides, other forensic evidences also helped clinch the case

Ujjwal Nikam, Special Public Prosecutor

Bhawal’s lawyer, Khopade, questioned the invocation of charges under the POCSO Act in absence of oral or documentary evidence to prove the victim's age. She also challenged the prosecution’s claim that the complainant, a cousin of the victim, had seen the prime accused Shinde after the incident.

Advocate Khopade questioned the claims made by another eyewitness — a “purported” classmate of the victim whom she (the lawyer) labelled as a “ghost witness” — that she had seen Shinde eve-teasing the victim in the presence of Bhawal and Bhailume two days before the incident.

The trial went through a series of hiccups, and at one stage, Khopade sought to summon six persons, including Nikam, as a defense witness, while Aher urged to call Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis as a defense witness in the case.

While Aher later withdrew his plea, Khopade moved the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad bench), which partly rejected her plea to make Nikam and four others as defense witness, but allowed one person, Rajendra Chavan to be made a defense witness.

Later, Khopade moved the Supreme Court which upheld the High Court orders.

(This IANS copy has been edited for length)

(Breathe In, Breathe Out: Are you finding it tough to breathe polluted air? Join hands with FIT in partnership with #MyRightToBreathe to find a solution to pollution. Send in your suggestions to [e-mail] or WhatsApp @ [phone])