Inflation Falls, Weak Demand: Time for Modi’s Version of New Deal?

Fiscal expenditure in sectors that can generate the maximum amount of jobs would be an effective course of action.

Fiscal expenditure in sectors that can generate the maximum amount of jobs would be the most effective course of action.

(Photo: PTI)

The RBI expectedly cut the repo rate last week by 25 basis points, bringing the key lending rate to a six-year low of six percent. This came in the backdrop of a steep fall in inflation and weak consumer demand across the country.

However, even though the industry had long demanded the cut, it is unlikely to do much to revive investment activity across the country as the root cause of the problem does not lie in high interest rates.

The twin balance sheet problem of high corporate debts and rising non-performing assets (NPAs) with banks has been impeding fresh corporate investments.

Also Read: RBI Halves Dividend Paid To Government For 2016-17

Why Firms Remain Conservative

Both borrowing and lending activities have been affected due to this long-standing problem. As of March 2017, India's corporate debt-to-GDP ratio stood at 55 percent of GDP, which is one of the highest among the emerging economies.

Moreover, a recent IMF report points out that nearly a fifth of the corporate debt is held by companies that are not making profit. In such a scenario, firms will remain conservative and avoid borrowing more funds as long as their debts remain at unmanageable levels.

Another reason for corporates to avoid fresh borrowing is their level of capacity utilisation – the extent to which their productive capacity is being utilised.

Also Read: India's Confused Monetary Policy And Its Committee

Fresh investments usually accrue when the capacity utilisation crosses the 80 percent mark. However, the level of capacity utilisation for Indian corporates is at historically low levels of 70-72 percent. Thus, fresh borrowings either for capacity expansion or newer projects seem unlikely in the near future. This will limit the effectiveness of monetary policy pursued by the RBI as low borrowing costs will not entice them to borrow fresh funds.

Further, the high levels of corporate debts are saddling banks with a rising pile of NPAs on their books. This is making banks risk-averse as a result and, hence, wary of lending to corporates. Bank credit to the commercial sector has fallen to 38 percent in FY 2017, down from 50 percent a year ago.

The Bond Market Boom

On the other hand, the bond market is booming with investment bankers arranging nearly Rs 1.04 lakh crore ($16 billion) in the April-to-June quarter of this year – the highest ever volume in the first quarter.

This behaviour points to the fact that Indian corporates are tapping more into the corporate bond market and taking the external commercial borrowing route for their financial needs instead of relying on banks. Hence, transmission of interest rates will always be an issue.

Thus, under the given situation, monetary policy can only do so much to remedy the current economic scenario which is in doldrums. Both the savings rate and the investment rate in the country – the two major drivers of growth – have consistently fallen in the absence of strong domestic or global demand.

Also Read: Inflation & GDP Slowdown: 5 Questions That RBI Needs to Answer

The savings rate (ratio of gross saving to GDP) has fallen from 33.1 percent in 2014-15 to 32.3 percent in 2015-16 while the investment rate (ratio of gross capital investment to GDP) has declined to 27.9 percent, from a peak of 37 percent in 2007.

As a result, the index of industrial production (IIP) has plummeted to 0.4 percent in June of 2017 from a robust 7 percent a year ago. Coal and cement production, which are the foremost indicators of industrial activity in the country, have contracted by 6.7 percent and 5.8 percent respectively in June.

Such a welter of worrying trends – including reduced GDP growth, tepid exports and low credit growth – make a strong case for the need to employ policy tools apart from monetary ones. Perhaps, it is time the government partly gives up the strict fiscal discipline that it has been following.

Fiscal Restraint – to What Extent?

It is necessary to question the extent to which fiscal restraint should be practiced. In times of low inflation and uncertain output gains, the nominal GDP is bound to fall. Maintaining low levels of fiscal deficit in such an economy can hardly be appreciated.

In fact, the government has enough fiscal space to loosen its purse strings. It can push the fiscal deficit target from 3.2 percent of GDP to 3.5 percent for 2017-18 without violating the provisions of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act. Also, the tax revenues for the government has seen an upward trend of late.

The central tax revenue has risen by 36.2 percent and non-tax by 4.1 percent in the first two months of this fiscal year as compared to the same period last year.

However, while pursuing expansionary policies, fiscal authorities need to do more than just indulge in higher public expenditure. They should pursue institutional policies that can stimulate demand on a sustained basis.

Therefore, fiscal expenditure in sectors that can generate the maximum amount of jobs would be the most effective course of action. It just might be time for Modi's version of the New Deal!

(Amit Kapoor is chair, Institute for Competitiveness, India. The views expressed are personal. He can be contacted at [e-mail] and tweets @kautiliya. Nirvan Gupta, an intern with Institute for Competitiveness, India, has contributed to the article.)

(Love your mother tongue? This Independence Day, tell The Quint why and how you love your bhasha. You may even win a BOL t-shirt! Sing, write, perform, spew poetry – whatever you like – in your mother tongue. Send us your BOL at [e-mail] or WhatsApp it to 9910181818.)