advertisement
With a face painted in black, a glittering crown sitting pretty on faux long curly hair and a short, thick neck embellished with a garland of palm-sized skulls and heads was a man in black robes merrily munching on mirchi wada.
I met Vikas Singh in a parking lot at Jodhpur, a jovial 30-year-old ‘Behrupiya’.
Belonging to the street performer community of Rajasthan that was traditionally engaged in this art, Vikas, however, didn’t involve himself in it very seriously. His not-so-perfect disguise and an ear-to-ear grin told me that he was in this for easy money.
Behrupiyas, their name derived from ‘bahu-roop’ or ‘many forms’ in Sanskrit, were the original entertainers on streets and in the courts of kings. They would don different disguises to perform various roles – ranging from despicable beggars to revered Hindu gods.
The earliest stories regarding the use of disguise and impersonation can probably be traced back to texts of the epic Mahabharata. In one such story, the Pandavas – after their defeat in a game of dice with Kaurava prince Duryodhan – had to agree to 12 years of forest life and one year of ‘agyatvas’ or living without being identified, thus forcing them to disguise themselves for a year.
While festivals and religious occasions called for behrupiyas to disguise themselves as deities, in the course of everyday disguises they would play the role of a jester – also called ‘maskhara’ or ‘naqqal’: the imitator for unadulterated fun and tease performances in village ‘chaupals’ and royal courts.
The ‘Bhand’ community from Uttar Pradesh – once respected for their craft – were the official court entertainers for the Nawab of Awadh.
For the everyday entertainer, it was a common practice to appear unannounced at wedding ceremonies and other events disguised as law enforcers, ‘khajanchi’ or money lender and hermits. They would then proceed to create a ruckus and fool the crowd. The high point of such performances was the reward or ‘bakshis’.
But the irony is, that the communities no longer practise this art because of meagre earnings and the disrespect meted out by society. The changing sensibilities of society and increased means of entertainment also gradually made people shy away from these performers. The means to livelihood decreased and the performers either gave up on the art or resorted to begging in garish make-up.
I met another father-son duo in the streets of Thanjavur. The son, a teenager, had a face painted blue, a crown with long hair sprouting from it and lips that had been painted a bright red. He was dressed as Lord Rama.
The father, deftly pushing the keys of a melodeon slung on his shoulders, sang a ‘bhajan’ extolling the Prince of Ayodhya – while the son stood with a raised palm to bless whoever cared to stop and give alms. Barefoot, the pair had to, time and again, stand in scorching heat. The father sang at the top of his voice above the din of air coolers to attract people from behind the closed doors.
Trying hard to make both ends meet, Bipin still wanted to continue practising the traditions that had been taught him, but the young boy shyly admitted his reluctance. He was more interested – he said – in watching films with modern day ‘nat’ aka actors singing and dancing on celluloid.
But unlike Bipin, most performers who still try their hand at their traditional art in festive celebrations and in religious processions, do not want their children to adopt the uncertain lifestyle. They prefer working as daily wage labourers and educating their children instead.
The fate of this dwindling art is almost sealed. “Abhi sab mukhota pehente hain, sab behrupiya hain” (Everybody wears a disguise nowadays, every person is an impersonator) – Bipin’s parting shot, as he collected a hundred rupees from me, left me thinking.
(Shoma Abhyankar is a travel writer and blogger based in Pune. She tweets at @throbbingmind)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)