advertisement
The Delhi High Court on Monday was informed by the Army that its Judge Advocate General (JAG) branch doesn’t recruit married women as they may “seek maternity leave which will result in discontinuation of their training” at the Officers’ Training Academy (OTA).
A division bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal was informed that after the 10 months training period, it is open to the female candidates to get married, while justifying its policy of not recruiting married women in JAG.
The army’s response came on a plea seeking direction to declare unconstitutional the eligibility conditions barring entry of married woman law graduate candidates in the army’s JAG branch.
The petition said that not recruiting married female candidates in JAG is “discrimination against females”.
In its affidavit, the army said:
The plea has said that the government recruits both married and unmarried males and only unmarried females in JAG, adding that due to this “institutionalised discrimination”, married female candidates who are law graduates are being “deprived of their right to serve in JAG department of Indian Army”.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)
Published: undefined