advertisement
"Bilkis was elated after the verdict. She began to cry. These were tears of joy. It's been a long fight with all the turmoil she faced, but it has given us immense satisfaction."
This is what Shobha Gupta, Bilkis Bano's counsel, told The Quint shortly after the Supreme Court on Monday, 8 January, quashed the 2022 remission and premature release granted to the 11 convicts in the gang-rape case of Bano during the 2002 Gujarat riots.
Directing the 11 convicts to report to jail authorities within two weeks, a apex court bench, led by Justices BV Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, noted that the Gujarat government was "not competent" to pass the remission order.
Meanwhile, Bilkis Bano's husband Yakub Rasul said, "We are happy with the SC verdict today. We have finally gotten justice after many years. We have always had faith in the court and they have kept our trust intact."
Soon after the verdict, Gupta said she video-called Bilkis Bano, who was "elated to hear the news."
Speaking to The Quint, Gupta said that the verdict was long overdue. The SC lawyer added that despite the hurdles, Bilkis always had "immense faith in the judiciary. That's why she decided to file the petition."
The verdict, she said, has given women a sense of satisfaction and faith in the judiciary.
In an interview with The Quint on 21 August 2022, six days after the convicts were released, Bilkis Bano's husband Yakub Rasool said that she was under shock.
"Bilkis toh itni maayus hai ki usne abhi tak kisi se baat nahi ki hai. Uska dil dukha hai aur uske mann mein darr baith gaya hai. (Bilkis is so disappointed that she hasn’t yet spoken to anyone. She is hurt and scared.)" he said.
The apex bench held that the SC order of 13 May 2022, which directed the Gujarat government to decide the remission as per the 1992 policy, was obtained by "fraud and suppression of facts."
The government to pass the remission orders would be the Maharashtra government (where the trial of the case took place), the bench led by Justice Nagarathna said.
"I have been clear from the beginning that this is one such case where convicts cannot be given remission simply because of the nature of the crime. There can be no right to be reformed in such a case," the lawyer said.
With the SC verdict, Gupta believed the court set clear guidelines to be followed for this case.
"The courts have to balance the right of a convict pleading for mercy against the right of a society to feel free from all these kinds of criminals. There are many Bilkis in India. If criminals like them roam freely, will we ever feel safe?" Gupta said.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)
Published: undefined