advertisement
Do you know that your private hospital is fleecing you based on which room you choose to hire?
It’s understandable to be charged more for a bed and bed services in a semi-private or private room, but you are probably also being charged extra for things like surgery, the operation theatre (OT), the anaesthetist’s fee, etc. You are paying at least 25% more for medical treatment that is totally unrelated to the kind of room you have hired.
32-year-old Sushil Kumar (name changed) visited one of Delhi’s biggest private hospitals, Apollo Hospital, to undergo surgery for a broken arm. Since his medical insurance had lapsed, his family members asked for the budget of the operation. They were given budgets for three different room categories, general ward, semi-private room and private room.
Total charge for the operation and a 2-night stay in the general ward was Rs 1.50 lakh, in semi-private room was Rs 1.82 lakh, and for the private room was Rs 2.21lakh. But the break-up shocked Kumar and his family.
Here is the break-up Kumar was given for surgery on his broken arm, to be operated on by the same doctor, irrespective of the room he opted for.
Kumar’s family wasn’t given any explanation for the extra charges levied for the same services. The Quint emailed Apollo Hospital and waited for their reply for 48 hours, but none came. We will update the piece if a reply is received.
Unfortunately, the government has failed to regulate the pricing of private hospitals, in spite of being fully aware of the fact that the people are burdened with overcharging. Though, The Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010, of Government of India does flag the issue of high costs in private hospitals. It says:
But the Act doesn’t regulate the private hospital’s pricing policy. As per the Act, the private hospitals are supposed to maintain transparency on their billing.
According to a survey conducted by Brookings India, as much as 75% of outpatient care and around 55% of inpatient care in the country was given by private hospitals in 2014.
The question remains: Why is the government not cracking the whip on soaring costs at private hospitals? Why is the government going slow on the private hospitals’ unjustified overcharging despite being fully aware that a large section of people depend on the private healthcare sector?
The United States of America’s healthcare system is dominated by private hospitals. But unlike the pricing policies of private hospitals in India, which is an utter travesty, in the US, the treatment cost does not vary with the room you pick. The Quint contacted Mount Sinai Hospital in New York to find out their pricing policy.
Clearly, the private hospitals in India are going a step ahead in their profit-making business.
Not just Indian Law but international law too doesn’t talk much about the evils of overpricing in private hospitals, although the Obama administration did initiate the Affordable Care Act, 2010 to assist US citizens in overcoming the prohibitive costs of the private healthcare sector.
But recently, Obamacare was repealed by the new President of America, Donald Trump, raising worries about the sustainability of the system.
As per the lease agreement (dated 16 March 1994) entered into between the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, the hospital agreed to run on ‘no profit no loss’ basis. Based on this conformity made by the hospital, the Delhi government agreed on:
The agreement also pointed out that the hospital was to provide free medical and other facilities to at least 1/3 rd of the total number of beds in the hospital, which was to be reserved for poor patients.
In 2009, a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed in the High Court by All India Lawyers Union against the Government of Delhi and Apollo Hospital seeking free medical treatment in this hospital based on the lease agreement of March 1994. The Court, in its order, said:
1) The hospital is to maintain records about free treatment and paid treatment, which shall be open to inspection at all time by the DGHS, and the Delhi government.
2) In the court’s opinion, this is a fit case for imposing exemplary cost on IMCL [Apollo Hospital] which has contested the matter and raised several frivolous objections to avoid its responsibility to give free treatment to the citizens as envisaged under the agreement.
According to experts in the healthcare system, private hospitals are inherently profit-making institutions. Hence, the government should encourage more public hospitals.
Not just one, but all private hospitals get some concessions from the government to build up their organisations in exchange for providing reasonable and quality medical treatment to citizens. But due to the lack of government surveillance and stringent laws, the private hospital industry in India is booming.
Now, the question is: Who will bell the cat? Will the government step forward to curb the despotism of private hospitals?
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)
Published: 30 Jan 2017,06:41 PM IST