advertisement
The Centre on Tuesday, 20 March, announced that the University Grants Commission (UGC) had decided to grant autonomy to 60 educational institutions, including 52 universities and eight colleges, across the country.
Out of the 52 universities, five are central universities, 21 are state universities, 24 are deemed universities and two are private universities.
Stating that the institutions granted autonomy have “maintained high standards”, Human Resource Development (HRD) minister Prakash Javadekar indicated that it was a step towards a ‘liberalised regime in the education sector’, with autonomy facilitating the quality of education.
So, what does this autonomy really mean? How were the institutes selected? Would it lead to a fee hike? And who is protesting against the decision? Here’s a deep-dive into all of these aspects.
The autonomy to the 60 institutes was granted under a UGC regulation on ‘Categorisation of Universities for Grant of Graded Autonomy’. The selection of the institutes was done primarily on the basis of National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) ratings that they have been accorded, with the 52 universities coming under two categories. While those having a NAAC score of 3.5 and above have been put in category I, those scoring between 3.26 and 3.5 belong to category II.
Meanwhile, those having scores below 3.26 were placed in category III, but none of the universities in this category were granted autonomy.
Following were the prominent universities selected for autonomy:
In addition to the 52 universities, the eight colleges granted autonomous status, once again selected primarily on the basis of the NAAC score, included Jai Hind College and Mithibai College in Mumbai.
Regarding the status, the principal of Jai Hind College was quoted by Hindustan Times as saying:
The decision to grant autonomy means that these universities will be free to start new courses, off-campus centres, skill development courses, research parks, and other academic programmes, while also being able to determine the fee structure.
In addition to this, the universities can also "hire foreign faculty, enroll foreign students, give incentive-based emoluments to the faculty, enter into academic collaborations, and run open distance learning programmes".
As far as the colleges are concerned specifically, the autonomy status will bring with it the freedom to decide on their own syllabus, conduct examinations as well as their evaluation, and announce the results. However, the awarding of degrees will continue to be carried out by the university under which they fall.
There will be differences in the level of autonomy accorded to category I institutes as compared to those falling under category II.
As pointed out by The Indian Express, for a category II institute like the Panjab University, while it would not attract any regular inspections when starting a new academic programme, it would still need an approval from the UGC to start off-campus centres, research parks, and enter into collaborations with foreign universities.
On the other hand, a category I institution would not need to pass through the UGC approval process for starting off-campus centres, research parks, etc, as well entering into agreements with foreign institutions.
An apprehension that has instantly cropped up after granting the autonomous status to these institutes is whether there would be a hike in the fee structure, thereby making it difficult for the poor to access quality education.
Naturally, any decision regarding the fee structure and the curriculum to be adopted vary from one institute to the other.
While this move would not mean that the grant to the universities by the UGC will stop, the financial pressure on them will increase and they will have to look for ways to fund themselves.
In this scenario, the fees for the existing courses may remain the same, but any new academic programme would have to be largely dependent on the university's own funds, which in turn, would mean a higher fees for the students. The authorities at Panjab University have indicated that though there may not be any change in the fee structure for existing courses, it would be under consideration as far as new courses are concerned.
The autonomy decision has met with protests by students and teachers of JNU and Delhi University. Students of Panjab University have also flagged their concerns over an impending fee hike and said that they will protest against the UGC's decision.
Some experts have also not lauded the move, with Rajan Welukar, former VC of Mumbai University, telling HT that it was a 'half-hearted' attempt.
SS Mantha, the former chairperson of All India Council for Technical Education, said that "in effect, the UGC confers a limited academic autonomy to the institutes".
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)