'Thor: Love and Thunder' Review: Intriguing But Duller Successor to 'Ragnarok'
Chris Hemsworth and Natalie Portman are the perfect 'Thors', and oh, did I miss Tessa Thompson as (King) Valkyrie!
advertisement
(This review is largely spoiler free)
Rarely have I been as confused and intrigued as I was by Thor: Love and Thunder, directed by Taika Waititi. Chris Hemsworth returns as the effortlessly (or so he makes it seem) charming and powerful God of Thunder, Thor and he completely leans to the carefree and brash blonde hero from pre-Endgame times.
Chris Hemsworth in Thor: Love and Thunder.
(Photo Courtesy: Universal PR/ Jasin Boland)
Though, it’d be incorrect to say he’s completely carefree– not only does he have to stop a terrifying god-killing villain, his ex is back and his trusted Mjolnir has deemed her worthy (Thor's 'triangle' with Mjolnir and Stormbreaker is pretty hilarious). Dr. Jane Foster (Natalie Portman) reaches Asgard in an attempt to treat her terminal illness and ends up taking up the mantle of the ‘Mighty Thor’.
Both Hemsworth and Portman, wielding Mjolnir and the axe Stormbreaker, fly and crash and fight with aplomb and their chemistry still crackles on screen. But even in their most heart-wrenching scenes, the film remains woefully superficial with little to no emotional depth.
Christian Bale as Gorr the God Butcher in a still from Thor: Love and Thunder.
(Photo Courtesy: Marvel Studios)
After being let down by the god he has devoted his life to and losing his daughter, Gorr is set on wiping all the gods out– and that includes our main man.
Gorr is terrifying and all props to Bale. The movie does seem to shy away from exploring Gorr’s full potential– making his ‘scare factor’ gimmicky at places and not in the endearing Marvel way.
Granted, Marvel still caters to kids as part of its target audience but even for kids, this Voldemort-esque villain will do little to be memorable.
If anything, the film made me wish I was watching Thor: Ragnarok again– not just for how brilliantly the film is crafted but also because of the inimitable Hela Odinsdottir (Cate Blanchett).
Cate Blanchett as Hela in a promotional poster for Thor: Ragnarok.
(Photo Courtesy: Twitter)
That being said, Waititi’s vision and wit does lead to some chuckle (and gasp) inducing scenes– the running joke with the screaming goats seems like it’d get old fast but it doesn’t.
King Valkyrie (Tessa Thompson) and Foster’s scenes together are also jovial and well-timed. But both their characters could’ve been developed much better, especially Foster’s.
Tessa Thompson and Natalie Portman in a still from Thor: Love and Thunder.
(Photo Courtesy: Jasin Boland)
Thor: Love and Thunder also has a more somber note to it with “love” being the fighting force behind everything…including the script. Juggling that many plotlines and genres is a tough job and if Waititi wasn’t at the helm, the film could’ve rapidly unraveled. But as it stands, it mostly seems directionless.
Before MCU Phase 4, everything was leading somewhere– there was an ‘endgame’ in sight– but the audience and the makers are perhaps struggling to find that tether in the latest phase (full of hits and misses). A detour to Omnipotence City serves purely to give the Thor franchise a push ahead and is…shiny.
A still from the Thor: Love and Thunder trailer.
(Photo Courtesy: YouTube)
The film is an explosion of colour in parts and displays incredible restraint in others: Be it the splashes of gold in a particular fight sequence or the glowing weapons in the Shadow Realm (where colour doesn’t enter).
Thor: Love and Thunder is slated for release in India on 7 July.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)