advertisement
The Election Commission has cited two specific provisions for suspending an IAS officer who checked PM Narendra Modi’s chopper in Odisha on 16 April.
Mohammed Mohsin, a Karnataka cadre IAS officer who was on duty as an election observer in Odisha’s Sambalpur district, was suspended with immediate effect for “dereliction of duty” and “acting contrary to the instructions of the Commission concerning SPG protectees”, a poll panel letter said.
The letter cites two instructions by the Election Commission regarding SPG protectees, which, according to the commission, Mohammed “has not acted in conformity with”.
This incident assumes greater significance in light of a recent video that had surfaced in Karnataka’s Chitradurga on 9 April. A mysterious black trunk, reported to have been offloaded from PM Modi’s chopper, was whisked away into the trunk of a private car not part of the PM’s official convoy.
What are the two instructions that have been cited and what do they say about searches inside vehicles of political personalities during election campaigning?
The letter mentions:
Upon checking, the instruction from March 2019 refers to the same instruction issued in April 2014. Therefore, in effect, the reason for suspending Mohsin is based on the the one from April 2014.
So, what does the one from 10 April 2014 say?
The letter, titled “Consolidated instructions on use of vehicles during elections” pertains to a set of rules shared with the chief electoral officers of all states and union territories meant to “ensure a level playing field for all candidates” as well as “check the vitiating rule of money and misuse of official missionary”.
Importantly, the thrust of the instruction cited by the EC is contained in point 4 of the letter:
Point number 8 of the same instruction mentions that the “prime minister and other political personalities” “in view of extremist and terrorist activities and threat to their lives” are entitled to the use of government vehicles even during elections.
However, the 6 page instruction letter from 2014 mention nothing about searches of cars or helicopters of those under SPG protection.
The Congress tweeted about this on Thursday morning, 18 April, arguing that the provisions cited “DOES NOT exempt PM’s vehicle from being searched”.
The other relevant document – Observer Handbook, Volumes I and II, published by the EC, a ready reckoner of all the duties for officers serving as poll observers – has no specific instructions regarding searches on vehicles of SPG-protected political leaders.
Moreover, another important document – Compendium of Instructions, Volume I – has no mention of a bar on searching the PM’s vehicle either.
Mohsin, a 1996 batch IAS from Karnataka cadre, has been working for the Backward Class Welfare Department under the Government of Karnataka since June 2016.
Previously, he worked as the Managing Director and the CEO of the KSSIDC (Karnataka State Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd) and as the Commissioner for Public Instruction for the Department of School Education, Government of Karnataka.
He started off his 23-year-long career as an IAS officer as a Sub Divisional Magistrate of Kundapur district of Karnataka.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)
Published: undefined