advertisement
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, while presenting the Union Budget 2022-23 in February this year had allocated Rs 1,400 crore for the Ken-Betwa interlinking project.
The project will divert the water from Ken river to Betwa river, both of which are tributaries of Yamuna, and would cover the Bundelkhand region.
Recently, in July the Steering Committee of Ken-Betwa Link Project (SC-KBLP) held their second meeting where the timeline, land acquisition, rehabilitation of displaced villages and other project related issues were discussed. And in a subsequent meeting it was decided that a central steering committee will set up a body to implement landscape and environment management plans.
The Bundelkhand region consists of thirteen districts; 7 in Uttar Pradesh-- Chitrakut, Banda, Jhansi, Jalaun, Hamirpur, Mahoba and Lalitpur and 6 in Madhya Pradesh-- Chhatarpur, Tikamgarh, Damoh, Sagar, Datia and Panna.
The frequency of droughts has gone up from one in every ten years over the last century, to seven between in only five years between 2005 and 2015.
Rainfall has been below the usual average and become more infrequent and erratic over the years.
This project, the government believes, will solve the problems of millions in the drought-prone region.
Betwa's basin is in a water deficit state while Ken basin has surplus water. The interlinking is expected to divert this 'surplus' water from Ken to Betwa.
The government expects this to "provide irrigation and drinking water supply in the drought prone and backward Bundelkhand region and transfer surplus water of Ken basin to water deficit Betwa basin, besides power generation."
How will this diversion of water happen?
Through building a dam and reservoir on Ken river to store this water and then building a canal connecting to Betwa river and channelling this surplus water from Ken to Betwa.
"A 77m high Daudhan Dam with gross storage capacity of 2953 million cubic meters (MCM) and reservoir submergence area of 9000 hectares(ha) along with a 221 Km long main canal is proposed," the government had said in a release.
And now, Rs 1,400 crore have also been allocated to implement this project.
But this doesn't mean all is good.
Along with the KBLP, the union budget also allocated money for several other river interlinking projects across the country.
Several of these projects had still not received statutory clearances, environmental clearances and many were were sub judice being legally challenged in courts.
Calling the clearance given by the National Board for Wildlife for KBLP illegal, Manoj Misra of Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan had told Down To Earth, “It did not have the authority to give the clearance. That is what has been challenged before the Supreme Court. The SC Central Empowered Committee has already acceded to this viewpoint that the clearance by the NBWL is illegal. How can any state, leave the Centre, think of implementing something like this?”.
The project has created potential threats to faunal as well as floral diversity, claimed studies. The proposed project may also have impact on the existing biodiversity and habitats as well as the people living and dependent on the natural resources needs.
A recent study put more facts on the table. It reveals that a sizeable part, over 65%, of forest land that falls in the core area of the Panna Tiger Reserve in Panna, Madhya Pradesh will submerge in the process of interlinking the two rivers.
Speaking of the magnitude of loss, the study said:
The study found that tree density, diversity and richness were maximum in the submerged area which was largely teak-dominated and has a thick understorey.
Panna Tiger Reserve has been recently declared as a Biosphere Reserve by UNESCO and is one of the most successful tiger re-introduction programme from 0 tigers in 2009 to 54 in 2019.
"Apart from successful tiger translocation, PTR is rich in prey species such as sambar Rusa unicolor, chital Axis axis, blue bull Boselaphus tragocamelus, chinkara Gazella bennettii, chausingha Tetracerus quadricornis, etc. All the species are protected under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 and are also listed in CITES," said the study.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)
Published: undefined